Spanning the Twitterverse to bring you the constant variety of tweets
The thrill of the retweet and the agony of the unfollow
The human drama of the twitter timeline
This is CadChica’s Wide World of Tworts
Today has been one of the craziest days I have ever seen on Twitter. It all started so innocently enough with what seemed like good news on the NFL labor dispute.
So we saw 8 of the 10 members of the labor committee go in the building. That's 3 more than any of previous 6 weeks, 2 more than yesterday.—
Albert Breer (@AlbertBreer) July 14, 2011
That makes it seem like it might be a good day right? It’s mid-July. Baseball is just coming off its All-Star break. The British Open began today but that was early morning of the first day so not much to tweet about there. Hmm. Might be a slow day I thought………….BOOM!!!!
#clemens attorney asking for mistrial because jury exposed to Laura Pettitte's statement—
Nedra Pickler (@nedrapickler) July 14, 2011
uh oh he might be moving toward a mistrial—
Les Carpenter (@Lescarpenter) July 14, 2011
BREAKING: Judge Reggie Walton rules a mistrial in the Roger #Clemens perjury trial.—
Mike Lederer (@MikeLederer) July 14, 2011
***********************************************************************************************
WOW! Roger Clemens, who was on trial for lying to Congress about using steroids, scored a HUGE victory today when the prosecution exposed the jury to testimony that the judge had previously said was inadmissible. BIG MISTAKE. The judge declared a mistrial.
Needless to say Twitter went a little crazy. The tweet below about sums it up.
Clemens trial a mistrial. And, wow.—
Rick Klein (@rickklein) July 14, 2011
***********************************************************************************************
Silly me. I had the nerve to think that was all that we were in for today. So much so that I tweeted THIS:
*sigh* Another slow sports news day will probably be dominated by court news #clemens—
CadChica Sports (@CadChica) July 14, 2011
***********************************************************************************************
A prognosticator I am not obviously. But I sincerely thought that would be THE story of the day. And then this little nugget came along:
Today on SI.com we debut our inaugural Twitter 100, the must-follow feeds in sports ( bit.ly/pGQF2Z). #SITwitter—
Sports Illustrated (@SInow) July 14, 2011
***********************************************************************************************
Have you ever heard the saying, “Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned.”? Whoa baby, substitute the word “sportswriter” for “woman” and you have a nice little Twitter story going on.
*Nods* RT @SPORTSbyBROOKS SI 100 Twitter follows embarrassing. (No Robinson, Wetzel, Florio) @jdubs88 has real list aol.it/q1Ohv0—
Jason Mcintyre (@TheBigLead) July 14, 2011
Sports Illustrated top 100 Twitter list: few journalists of color, no independent sports bloggers. In other words, total crap.—
mike freeman (@realfreemancbs) July 14, 2011
Oh yeah, Sports Illustrated and Quickish? You're not on MY must-follow lists either. Pieces of …—
Gregg Doyel (@greggdoyelcbs) July 14, 2011
@DanWolken 99% of the lists & aggregation in sports: 'Are we friends? Hey, i'll link you up!' Oh, i don't like that guy, he's off the list—
Jason Mcintyre (@TheBigLead) July 14, 2011
I like how people get upset when they're not on a list. It's a freaking list.—
Bryan Fischer (@BryanDFischer) July 14, 2011
~~~~~
This one, said it pretty well.
What's the point of a "who to follow" sports list? We all like different sports, regions, types of humor, etc. There's no universal musts.—
Melissa Jacobs (@thefootballgirl) July 14, 2011
~~~~~
The Football Girl makes a point, in asking, ’Who cares’? I thought about the answer to that. I do not know if there is one right answer. My initial reaction is the ESPN effect. ESPN and its channels, with shows like Around the Horn, have turned many sportswriters into “stars”. Now I don’t know exactly how someone goes to work for ESPN. I’ve seen ESPN’ers post job openings on Twitter. ESPN, like most companies, has employment information on their website as well. But to become one of their select few on these reporter-centered shows is beyond my “fan” knowledge.
Sports Illustrated is one of the ‘power-brokers’ if you will, in the sports media market (my opinion). SI used Twitter to announce their list. The convergence of two powerful mediums such as SI and Twitter for a sportswriter could potentially be a boon to a career. This list of their ‘must follows’ was, in essence, their seal of approval. A seal of approval from SI means they are someone in sports media that should be listened to. And that, means someone like ESPN might take notice and provide a larger platform from which they can speak.
That’s my theory. Right or wrong? I don’t know. It’s either that or the negative reaction is one of insecurity (i.e. ‘not being accepted into the cool kids group at school’). I don’t know any sportswriter on a personal basis so I can’t speak to the insecurity part. From what I read and hear, it is not an easy business to be in. To make it on a national stage, I believe you have to make a lot of sacrifices, both good and bad, and you have to work extremely long hours to do so. I’m just a fan, but that insecurity is a possibility, and it’s my opinion.
I thought the Twitter news was done…..
***********************************************************************************************
until this BOMBSHELL came down this afternoon:
College football writer Bruce Feldman was suspended indefinitely by ESPN this morning. Details: http://bit.ly/qRSdRx—
(@SPORTSbyBROOKS) July 14, 2011
Picking up my mouth off the floor, I retweeted that right away. Bruce Feldman, who by all accounts seemed like a great college football sportswriter, was suspended by ESPN. The reason, according to the story from Sports by Brooks, was that he was suspended in relation to Mr. Feldman’s participation in Mike Leach’s new book; he had received approval from ESPN to do so. Mike Leach, the former Texas Tech head footbalI coach, was fired by the school. His new book, just recently out, blasts ESPN and, in particular, announcer Craig James. I wasn’t sure what the effect would be but it EXPLODED my Twitter timeline. It didn’t disappoint.
ESPN suspends one of their best writers and yet lets the guy who orchestrated to get a coach fired continue to work. Complete B.S. ESPN.—
Bryan Fischer (@BryanDFischer) July 14, 2011
I know Bruce. My heart goes out to him. He's got great character and integrity. I'm confident he's done nothing wrong.—
Lisa Horne (@LisaHorne) July 14, 2011
I had the distinct pleasure to work w/ & meet Bruce Feldman while I was at ESPN. Consumate professional & nicest guy you'd ever meet.—
Chadd Scott (@ChaddScott) July 14, 2011
Just remember: it's not the Ethics and Sports Programming Network, and never has been. #freebruce—
John Blanchette (@SRjblanchette) July 15, 2011
Text I got from an ESPNer: "This Bruce stuff is nuts. If anything, suspend me to save him."—
Andy Staples (@Andy_Staples) July 15, 2011
So Bruce Feldman is suspended by ESPN for involvement in Leach book and Craig James still has a job. That will take some time to digest.—
Jon Wilner (@wilnerhotline) July 15, 2011
~~~~~
That’s just a very small sampling of what was tweeted on the Twitterverse today regarding Bruce Feldman. There was just so much outrage from both media and fans alike regarding this. I cannot possibly begin to do them all justice. I tried, I really tried hard to find a tweet in support of the suspension. Aside from the fans angry that Bruce Feldman said a negative (read: honest) comment about their team, there wasn’t one. Not one that I could find. I did find this:
Rivalries/grudges run rampant in our business. We fight with each other like idiots over idiotic things. And no one dislikes Bruce Feldman.—
Wes Rucker (@wesrucker247) July 14, 2011
***********************************************************************************************
In the issue of fairness, I do not know all of the details; I’m just a sports fan. Who does know other than the key parties involved and the HR department at ESPN? The magnitude of this was amazing to me. Just a few short hours before, it seemed as though sniping was going on over a “stupid Twitter list” (another person’s tweet not mine). How quickly one tweet can change the dynamics of a timeline!
The reaction happened like an avalanche. In one moment it went from routine activity, to giant slabs of ice and snow barrelling down the mountain at breakneck speed….not stopping until all of its power and rage has been unleashed on the unsuspecting wilderness below it. In the context of Bruce Feldman’s suspension that’s how quickly the sports Twitterverse reacted. As of now, that avalanche has not stopped.
One story that is already out there is calling this action, ESPN’s Waterloo. Whether it will be or not remains to be seen. There could be more to this story we don’t know yet. However, the power of social media, in the hands of “the media”, could prove to be quite dramatic. Will it amount to anything in relation to Mr. Feldman? Only time will tell.
Meanwhile, the avalanche continues….
CadChica Sports